Avoiding the “Hidden Obvious” in website design evaluation.
So much of what comprises smart research is fundamental common sense. This is particularly true for websites. By observing users, by asking smart questions, and by thinking carefully about what users say and do, it’s relatively straightforward to create strong websites -- websites that meet or exceed the objectives established for them. It’s hard work, but good results are virtually guaranteed.
What’s surprising is how rarely this work gets done and deployed by website owners. The result is a syndrome we call “the Hidden Obvious” -- a situation in which websites suffer from flagrant and serious issues which stare developers in the face, but which they simply cannot see themselves.
We know this happens because we typically discover several of these “landmines” in every project. We may be engaged in some task with consumers only to find them stumbling on something remarkably basic -- such as comprehension of a main menu item, how to use a key utility, or how to complete a simple registration or transaction. User logic is not developer logic.
We even encounter situations where the entire website’s reason for being is fundamentally challenged by the “target” user.
Many developers and marketers simply don’t do their homework by talking to their users. Marketers are more likely to “tough it out” without research when developing websites, compared to other advertising or marketing media. It strikes them as a less-potent or lighter medium, rather like a yellow-pages ad. “We don’t research it, we just do it,” is often the response. They’re a prime candidate for “hidden obvious” disease.
Obviously research cost becomes a consideration, but with the average e-commerce website well into the six (if not seven) figures, how smart is the cost avoidance of the modest investment required for the consumer research which virtually guarantees success?
The problem with this outlook is that the Internet is the platform for the most complete presentation of your brand. But, without careful assessment of its impact, it’s bound to hit sour notes with users. That’s because this is by far the most complex marketing medium ever created. Without careful evaluation with consumers, marketers are nearly guaranteed to make serious errors.
The “hidden obvious” -- the inability of developers or marketers to understand the very most basic of problems with their websites -- is the result of one or more of three basic issues:
So, what’s the best approach to avoiding “hidden obvious” syndrome? Engage in Iterative Development -- conducting small bursts of research at key points during the development process.
The use of quantitative research has been raised often by prospective clients as a “smarter” and more “definitive” measurement of user experience. Quantitative measures are smart when measuring the “what” and “how many”, but can’t penetrate the “why” and “how” of user needs and experience. Moreover, how do you decide what questions to ask? Do you simply ask what’s important to you? If so, you’re a prime candidate for a “hidden obvious” experience, because you’re not necessarily asking about that which your users find important.
Avoid the “hidden obvious” by conducting smart qualitative diagnostic consumer website evaluations early in the website development process. It will save money and time by avoiding rework. It will result in a more successful website.| about | contact | site map | press room |